This chapter and the two chapters ('Protection for your rights at work' and 'Occupational health and safety') should be read together when considering the law covering the rights, entitlements and obligations of employees in Victoria.


Aimee Brennan

Solicitor, Lander & Rogers

Cherie Fung

Solicitor, Lander & Rogers

Employment contracts

Last updated

1 July 2022

Overview of employment contracts

A worker’s rights and duties depend on whether the individual is an employee or an independent contractor.

Awards and workplace agreements – and legislation concerned with working relationships and conditions – mostly apply to employees, rather than to independent contractors.


An ‘employee’ is a worker who works for another person in exchange for wages. The contract under which an employee performs work is called a ‘contract of service’.

A definition of ‘casual employee’ has been inserted into the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (‘FW Act’) and provides that a person is a casual employee if:

  • they are offered a job;
  • the offer does not include a firm advance commitment that the work will continue indefinitely with an agreed pattern of work; and
  • they accept the offer knowing that there is no firm advance commitment and become an employee.

There are other arrangements for the performance of work that look like employment contracts, but are actually independent contracting arrangements, or contracts for the provision of services.

Independent contractors

In general, independent contractors are not covered by statutory minimum standards, awards or enterprise agreements made under the FW Act (see ‘National Employment Standards’, ‘Awards: The Fair Work Act and modern awards‘ and ‘Enterprise agreements’).

The contract under which an independent contractor performs work is called a ‘contract for services’. Independent contracting arrangements are widely used in a range of industries, including the transport and building industries.

Employee or independent contractor?

The courts have developed tests to distinguish between employees and independent contractors. The touchstone is the nature and degree of detailed control that the employer exercises over an individual’s work.

Other factors are also considered, including whether:

  • the employer supplies the employee’s tools and equipment;
  • the employer deducts PAYG (pay as you go) tax instalments from the worker’s earnings;
  • the employee is able to work for other employers;
  • the employee can delegate work to an employee or sub-contractor;
  • the employee carries a financial risk; and
  • the employee has an opportunity to participate in the profits of the employer’s business.

In the case of Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 44, the High Court decided that the relationship between a courier company (‘Vabu’) and its couriers was that of employer and employee. The court considered relevant the fact that the couriers were not providing skilled labour, had little control over the manner of performing their work whereas Vabu had considerable scope to exercise control, wore Vabu uniforms, and were provided with pay summaries.

The High Court further clarified the distinction between employee and independent contractor in the recent case of ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek (2022) 398 ALR. The appeal in this case was heard in conjunction with the appeal in Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd (2022) 398 ALR 404.

In these cases, the High Court emphasised that the character of the relationship between the parties is to be determined by having regard to the rights and duties created by the written agreement between the parties.

The case of ZG Operations Australia case concerned two truck drivers who had each entered into a contract with ZG Operations Australia for the provision of delivery services through a partnership. The truck drivers were held not to be employees of the company.

Contents of a common law contract of employment

Overview of contract terms

Each common law contract of employment contains terms and conditions by which the parties regulate their relationship. Such terms may be oral or written, or a combination of the two. Often, letters of appointment, job descriptions, policy manuals, awards, collective agreements, workplace practices and legislation are sources of further terms of a contract.

Under the FW Act, the terms of an employment contract cannot displace an entitlement under the National Employment Standards (see ‘National Employment Standards’), but they can offer more generous terms.

Implied contract terms

The common law implies certain terms into every contract of employment. These terms impose obligations on employees and employers. Further obligations in the relationship between employee and employer arise in tort, equity and from fiduciary duties.

An example of a common law implied contractual term is the common law duty of fidelity and confidentiality, which prevents employees from using or disclosing their employer’s trade secrets.

Also implied into every contract of employment is a general duty to obey the employer’s lawful and reasonable directions. Further, all employees are obliged to exercise reasonable care and skill in the performance of their duties.

Contracts of employment that do not include an express termination provision contain an implied term that the employer will give the employee ‘reasonable notice’ before terminating employment, unless the employer has summarily dismissed the employee. ‘Summary dismissal’ is dismissal without notice. An employer only has a legal right to summarily dismiss an employee without notice for serious misconduct or other conduct that justifies immediate dismissal.

Breach of an employment contract

Like any contract, either party may sue for damages if an employment contract is breached.

For example, engaging in a strike may constitute a breach of an employment contract by an employee; or when an employee is not given the requisite period of notice specified under their contract, the employee may seek damages for breach of contract.

These common law rights have to some extent been superseded by statutory rights to sue for reinstatement, breach of statutory agreements, compensation and underpayment of wages.

Back to
Rights, activism and fair treatment at work